Skip to main content
· 12/19/1984

Thompson v. Barrett

Citations

  • 599 F. Supp. 806
  • 36 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 35,021
  • 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21089
  • 36 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 817

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[t]his was certainly an exceptional case, with far-reaching impact on an entire business or profession.”
  • “[concurrent with [the applicants’] burden is the duty of the district court to justify with particularity why an adjustment is needed to fully compensate the attorneys.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Charles R. Richey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.