· 12/19/1984
Thompson v. Barrett
Citations
- 599 F. Supp. 806
- 36 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 35,021
- 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21089
- 36 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 817
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[t]his was certainly an exceptional case, with far-reaching impact on an entire business or profession.”
- “[concurrent with [the applicants’] burden is the duty of the district court to justify with particularity why an adjustment is needed to fully compensate the attorneys.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Charles R. Richey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.