Skip to main content
· 8/20/1991

Thompson & Tomada Enterprises, Inc. v. McKinley County

Citations

  • 816 P.2d 494
  • 112 N.M. 425

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that party making equal protection challenge bears burden of demonstrating that statute is arbitrary and capricious
  • upholding a statute that authorized local elections in McKinley County to determine whether alcoholic beverages should be sold from drive-up windows because special circumstances in McKinley County required special remedial measures
  • Equal Protection Clauses of state and federal constitutions prohibit statutes which “create[] classifications that are unreasonable, that do not relate to the statutory purpose, and that are not based on real differences.”
  • equal protection prohibits statutory classifications which are unreasonable or unrelated to statutory purpose
  • equal protection prohibits statutory classifications which are unreasonable or unrelated to statutory purpose
  • “Each law must be evaluated on its own special circumstances.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baca, Ransom, Montgomery

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.