Thompson Scenic Ry. Co. v. Chestnut Hill Casino Co.
Citations
- 119 F. 359
- 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 5266
Syllabus
<p>1. Patents—Anticipation—Pleasure Railways.</p> <p>The Thompson patent, No. 367,252, claim 5, for an elevated gravity and cable road, in combination with a car provided with an automatic grip, is void for anticipation.</p> <p>2. Same—Invention.</p> <p>The Hinkle patent, No. 307,942, claim 1, for “a gravity tramway having a convoluted return curved track, crossing itself, substantially as described, for the purpose set forth,” which is to economize space by making the track go twice around, instead of once, is void for lack of patentable invention; also held not infringed, even if valid.</p>
Judges: Archbald
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.