Thompson Medical Company, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the FDA “has no warrant” to address the defendant’s claim that Aspercreme is more effective than aspirin because “the FDA’s evaluation of OTC drugs only involves a determination of the safety and efficacy of individual drugs”
• involving false advertising claims relating to an analgesic, the safety and effectiveness of which the FDA had been studying since 1962
• “[O]urs is an age of overlapping and concurring regulatory jurisdiction.”
• requiring two well-controlled clinical studies

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).