Skip to main content
· 12/22/2015

Thompson, Bradley Leroy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he Castro notice-and- warning requirement applies to pleadings recharacterized as § 2254 petitions.”
  • hold- ing that because the petitioner’s motion was recharacterized as a § 2254 petition without the notice and warnings required by Cas- tro, the district court erred in dismissing his later petition as an un- authorized second or successive petition
  • extending Castro requirement to § 2254 petitions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.