· 12/15/1833
Thomasson v. Baum
Citations
- 6 La. 123
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding dispute of fact as to whether rotation was essential where evidence could support either party and plaintiff pointed to evidence that she did not rotate despite employer’s claim rotation was essential for 5 years
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mathews
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.