Skip to main content
· 12/15/1833

Thomasson v. Baum

Citations

  • 6 La. 123

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding dispute of fact as to whether rotation was essential where evidence could support either party and plaintiff pointed to evidence that she did not rotate despite employer’s claim rotation was essential for 5 years

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mathews

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.