Thomason v. Richards

Citations

• 6 Cal. Unrep. 863
• 67 P. 1056
• 1902 Cal. LEXIS 879

Syllabus

<p>Street Improvements.—In an Action to Recover on a Paving Contract, where plaintiff had read in evidence a written contract, under the terms of which plaintiff agreed to pave the street in front of defendant’s premises to the satisfaction of the superintendent of streets, a resolution of the board of supervisors stating that the work had been constructed to the satisfaction of the superintendent, and accepting the same, was competent evidence.</p> <p>Street Improvement.—Evidence as to the Character of Concrete work in the street after the date when the work had been accepted by the street superintendent was incompetent, especially when there was nothing to show that it related to any of the work for which plaintiff sought to recover.</p>