Thomas Wilson, III v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant “must show a reasonable probability that, but for the error, he would not have entered the plea” (citation modified)
• holding that, when the non-association standard condition implicates a protected familial relationship, a “thorough justification is required”
• holding that defendant “must show a reasonable probability that, but for the error, he would not have entered the plea” (citation modified)
• indicating that a defendant's conviction may be vacated under Rehaif if he was not sentenced to more than one year in prison on the prior felony
• stating that evidence that the defendant had been informed of the maximum penalties associated with his offense, coupled with his suspended sentence of more than a year in prison, “removes any doubt that [he] was aware of his membership in § 922(g)(1
• accepting Truscello but agreeing with a defendant’s objection to the standard condition prohibiting communication with convicted felons because in the particular case it would interfere with a familial relationship

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).