Skip to main content
· 5/14/1999

Thomas, William v. Network Solutions

Citations

  • 176 F.3d 500
  • 336 U.S. App. D.C. 74
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 9065
  • 1999 WL 300619

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that company in charge of Internet domain names is a private actor
  • assuming that congressional ratification mooted an unauthorized-tax claim
  • affirming dismissal of essential facilities claim because plaintiffs were not competitors of defendants
  • “[L]egislation may confirm and render lawful otherwise unlawful federal agency actions . . . .”
  • “A contractor might be free to perform the contract in any number of ways, only one of which is anticompetitive.”
  • “is hereby legalized and ratified and confirmed as fully to all intents and purposes as if the same had, by prior act of Congress, been specifically 5 authorized and directed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Randolph, Rogers, Garland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.