Thomas v. Young

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an attorney had “appeared” when he iden- tified himself as counsel in the court’s appearance form, phys- ically came into court, signed pleadings, and identified himself as counsel to opposing counsel
• finding that an enforcement policy adopted by the California State Bar Association was a mere enforcement strategy which would not be binding on the courts.
• declaring the term “offensive personality” too vague to inform a reasonable attorney what conduct will be sanctioned
• declaring the term \offensive personality\ too vague to inform a reasonable attorney what conduct will be sanctioned
• “With respect to the court’s inherent power, we note that an attorney admitted to a particular bar may be disciplined for conduct that violates that bar’s local rules of professional conduct.”
• “We need not decide what the appropriate standard of review should be in the instant appeal . . . because we would reach the same result regardless of which one were applied.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).