Thomas v. Williams
Citations
- 50 Tex. 269
Syllabus
<p>1. Homestead abandonment.—The removal from a homestead to a village, for the purpose of educating the children of the family, and the contracting for a new homestead, will not necessarily evidence an abandonment of the homestead.</p> <p>2. Fact case.—See facts held insufficient to establish an abandonment of a homestead.</p> <p>3. Homestead—Declarations of husband.—The mere declarations of the husband, or of third persons, though ever so fraudulent, if false do not prevent the assertion of the homestead exemption by the husband and wife.</p> <p>4. Same—Declarations of wife—Estoppel.—Neither the declarations of the wife, nor her written recognition or ratification of previous deeds by her husband not in conformity with the statutes regulating conveyances by married women, but which are not shown to have misled the parties claiming under the deeds from the husband to their injury, mil estop the wife from asserting her homestead rights.</p>
Judges: Moore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Gulf Production Co. v. Continental Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court· 1939-11-01· cited 79×
- Chalk v. DaggettTexas Commission of Appeals· 1924-01-09· cited 48×
- Crews v. General Crude Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1955-05-19· cited 9×
- Earhart v. AgnewTexas Commission of Appeals· 1920-06-02· cited 3×
- Texas Pac. Coal & Oil Co. v. GuthrieCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1936-11-27· cited 3×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.