Thomas v. Wasco County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that medical evidence as to nexus to service expressed as “could” suffices for requirement of well-grounded claim
• stating that a medical opinion, expressed in terms of could, was sufficient to satisfy the nexus requirement of a well-grounded claim
• distinguishing Tirpak and stating in dictum that medical evidence as to nexus to service expressed as “could” suffices for requirement of well-grounded claim, with Alemany v. Brown, 9 Vet.App. 518, 519 (1996

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).