Skip to main content
· 7/27/2011

Thomas v. US Bank National Association

Citations

  • 260 P.3d 711
  • 244 Or. App. 457
  • 2011 Ore. App. LEXIS 1066

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting the relevance of a party’s incentive to litigate in the first case
  • “Privity” for issue preclusion “encompasses ‘those who control an action although not parties to it; those whose interests are represented by a party to the action; and successors in interest to those having derivative claims.’ ”
  • discussing history of the Belknap class action litigation
  • discussing bur- den of proof
  • discussing bur- den of proof

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haselton, Armstrong, Duncan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.