· 7/27/2011
Thomas v. US Bank National Association
Citations
- 260 P.3d 711
- 244 Or. App. 457
- 2011 Ore. App. LEXIS 1066
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting the relevance of a party’s incentive to litigate in the first case
- “Privity” for issue preclusion “encompasses ‘those who control an action although not parties to it; those whose interests are represented by a party to the action; and successors in interest to those having derivative claims.’ ”
- discussing history of the Belknap class action litigation
- discussing bur- den of proof
- discussing bur- den of proof
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Haselton, Armstrong, Duncan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.