Thomas v. United States Disciplinary Barracks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• emphasizing fourth factor and holding that a summary disposition may still demonstrate full and fair consideration
• finding merits review permissible “where the briefing [wa]s cursory and no indications of full consideration otherwise exist”
• finding sufficient consideration despite the fact that the military court did not hear oral argument or explain its reasoning
• “We ... decline to presume a military court has failed to consider all the issues presented to it before making a decision.”
• “We ... decline to presume a military appellate court has failed to consider all the issues presented to it before making a decision.”
• “We also decline to presume a military appellate court has failed to consider all the issues presented to it before making a decision.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).