Tenth Circuit· 11/16/2010

Thomas v. United States Disciplinary Barracks

Citations

625 F.3d 667
2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 23527
2010 WL 4609184

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

emphasizing fourth factor and holding that a summary disposition may still demonstrate full and fair consideration
finding merits review permissible “where the briefing [wa]s cursory and no indications of full consideration otherwise exist”
finding sufficient consideration despite the fact that the military court did not hear oral argument or explain its reasoning
“We ... decline to presume a military court has failed to consider all the issues presented to it before making a decision.”
“We ... decline to presume a military appellate court has failed to consider all the issues presented to it before making a decision.”
“We also decline to presume a military appellate court has failed to consider all the issues presented to it before making a decision.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hartz, Anderson, Tymkovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Thomas v. United States Disciplinary Barracks

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.