Skip to main content

Thomas v. Thomas

Citations

  • 203 So. 2d 118
  • 281 Ala. 397
  • 1967 Ala. LEXIS 973

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that husband’s knowledge of his obligation of support and his subsequent election to enter employment that would substantially reduce his income and make it impossible to meet his obligations would not justify reduction in support
  • holding that husband's knowledge of his obligation of support and his subsequent election to enter employment that would substantially reduce his income and make it impossible to meet his obligations would not justify reduction in support
  • other factors to consider include the prospect of improving professional competence or leading a more satisfying life

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harwood, Livingston, Goodwyn, Merrill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.