Supreme Court of Alabama· 10/12/1967
Thomas v. Thomas
Citations
- 203 So. 2d 118
- 281 Ala. 397
- 1967 Ala. LEXIS 973
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that husband’s knowledge of his obligation of support and his subsequent election to enter employment that would substantially reduce his income and make it impossible to meet his obligations would not justify reduction in support
- holding that husband's knowledge of his obligation of support and his subsequent election to enter employment that would substantially reduce his income and make it impossible to meet his obligations would not justify reduction in support
- other factors to consider include the prospect of improving professional competence or leading a more satisfying life
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harwood, Livingston, Goodwyn, Merrill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Schuler v. SchulerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1981-01-27· cited 90×
- Pope v. PopeNebraska Supreme Court· 1997-02-14· cited 42×
- Kiefer v. KieferCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1995-08-11· cited 41×
- Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1991-12-20· cited 27×
- Clarke v. ClarkeCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1972-03-08· cited 16×
- Forlini v. ForliniCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1983-11-09· cited 13×
- Welch v. WelchCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1973-03-21· cited 13×
- Hora v. HoraCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1971-02-10· cited 11×
- Shellene v. ShelleneAppellate Court of Illinois· 1977-10-05· cited 8×
- Lynn v. LynnNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1977-10-25· cited 7×
- Wolcott v. WolcottNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1987-03-05· cited 4×
- Lamar v. LamarCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1982-12-08· cited 4×
- Fox v. FoxCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1995-03-03· cited 1×
- Lámar v. LámarCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1982-12-08
- Little v. LittleCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-05-21
- Robertson v. RobertsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2004-12-10
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Nelson v. NelsonOregon Supreme Court· 1960-12-21· cited 49×
- Fort v. FortSupreme Court of Florida· 1956-10-31· cited 38×
- Whitt v. WhittSupreme Court of Alabama· 1964-07-09· cited 27×
- Kelly v. KellyMichigan Supreme Court· 1916-12-21· cited 18×
- Adair v. AdairSupreme Court of Alabama· 1952-11-13· cited 14×
- Young v. YoungSupreme Court of Alabama· 1954-10-07· cited 14×
- Gambrell v. GambrellSupreme Court of Alabama· 1959-03-19· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.