Thomas v. Thomas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \Alimony is never for the purpose of penalizing the wife or the husband for her or his misconduct.\
• “Alimony is never for the purpose of penalizing the wife or the husband for her or his misconduct.”
• dentist, circumstantial evidence of suppression of income
• dentist, circumstantial evidence of suppression of income

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Duncan v. Duncan
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1993-03-15· cited 24×
• Farrish v. Farrish
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2005-06-30· cited 19×
• Kosikowski v. Kosikowski
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1979-04-04· cited 16×
• Mathews v. Penley
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1978-09-06· cited 12×
• Rea v. Rea
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1976-06-08· cited 5×
• Sedehi v. Chamberlin
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2018-02-09· cited 5×
• Waddill v. Waddill
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1977-10-12· cited 4×
• Arya John Sedehi v. Amanda Chamberlin
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2018-02-09

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• McCurry v. McCurry
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1967-04-20· cited 39×
• Wills v. Wills
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1959-11-04· cited 20×
• McCartney v. McCartney
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1961-09-08· cited 18×
• Gardner v. Gardner
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1875-07-15· cited 1×
• McDonald v. McDonald
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1973-05-31· cited 1×