Thomas v. Stephens

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that this Court “independently review[s]” the legal conclusions of a bankruptcy court de novo notwithstanding the intermediate review of the district court
• stating that failure to comply with Rule 9013-1(b) “may be grounds to strike the response or to grant the motion by default”
• “[T]he 503(b)(1)(D) exception does not apply where the court has entered an administrative bar date order applicable to governmental units.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).