Thomas v. St. Luke's Health Systems, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding employer’s initial demands that employee take drug test, which was subsequently withdrawn, and accept another position had no impact on continued employment and did not rise to level of adverse employment action
• holding employer's initial demands that employee take drug test, which was subsequently withdrawn, and accept another position had no impact on continued employment and did not rise to level of adverse employment action
• finding that § 1981 claim should be dismissed for want of federal question when jurisdiction under § 1331 was not pled
• holding employer’s initial demands that employee take drug test, which was subsequently withdrawn, and accept another position had no impact on continued employment and did not rise to level of adverse employment action
• granting summary judgment for failure to generate a genuine issue of material fact on race discrimination claim
• “The federal courts have a duty to examine the substantiality of the federal claim throughout the litigation, and must dismiss all claims ... for want of a federal question” where the federal claim “proves patently meritless”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).