Thomas v. Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co.
Citations
- 104 Kan. 432
- 179 P. 372
- 6 A.L.R. 1145
- 1919 Kan. LEXIS 285
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Compensation Act — Employee Injured During Noon Intermission— Liability of Employer. • In an action under the workmen’s compensation law thére was evidence that the plaintiff, a seventeen-year-old girl, who was paid by the hour, was injured during a half-hour intermission at noon while, although at liberty to leave the premises, she remained there, and after eating her lunch engaged with fellow employees in accordance with a custom known to and approved by her employer, in riding on a truck, her injury being caused by falling from the truck while it was being drawn by a fellow employee; held, that a finding was justified that the accident occurred in the course of her employment.</p> <p>2. Same — Evidence — Findings. It is further held that the evidence stated was sufficient to support a finding that the plaintiff’s injury arose out of her employment.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- compensation allowed where claimant was injured during noon hour while playfully riding on a hand truck
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mason
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1940-03-01· cited 63×
- Hale v. Savage Fire Brick Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1921-03-05· cited 52×
- Tocci v. Tessler & Weiss, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1959-01-20· cited 49×
- Corpora v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1930-02-08· cited 45×
- Willis v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1920-03-30· cited 41×
- Bailey v. Mosby Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1945-07-07· cited 39×
- Hilyard v. Lohmann-Johnson Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1949-11-12· cited 35×
- Palmer v. MainCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1925-05-26· cited 34×
- Granville v. Scranton Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1921-04-18· cited 33×
- In Re Quest. Sub. by US Ct. of AppealsSupreme Court of Colorado· 1988-06-20· cited 32×
- MacK v. Reo Motors, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court· 1956-04-02· cited 31×
- University of Denver v. NemethSupreme Court of Colorado· 1953-04-20· cited 30×
- Colson v. SteeleIdaho Supreme Court· 1953-01-10· cited 28×
- Twin Peaks Canning Co. v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court· 1921-03-10· cited 28×
- Geary v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court· 1947-12-23· cited 25×
- Ryan v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1927-11-15· cited 25×
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court· 1952-08-28· cited 24×
- Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n v. DavidsonCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1956-10-26· cited 23×
- Haas v. Kansas City Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1921-05-07· cited 22×
- Tierney ex rel. Tierney v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1923-11-10· cited 21×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Dzikowska v. Superior Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1918-01-07· cited 72×
- Haller v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court· 1917-04-09· cited 69×
- White v. Kansas City Stock Yards Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1919-01-11· cited 33×
- Benson v. BushSupreme Court of Kansas· 1919-02-08· cited 15×
- People ex rel. Dale v. LawsonIllinois Supreme Court· 1918-10-21· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.