Skip to main content
· 6/15/1987

Thomas v. PA. HUMAN RELATIONS COMM.

Citations

  • 527 A.2d 602
  • 106 Pa. Commw. 598
  • 1987 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 2219

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defining prima facie case as whether complainant “was a member of a protected minority, with a desire to remain at his employment, and was discharged”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Colins', Palladino, Narick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.