Skip to main content
· 8/16/2017

Thomas v. Ohio Dept. of Mental Health

Citations

  • 2017 Ohio 7525

Syllabus

Objection Civ.R. 53. The court determined that plaintiff's objections were untimely filed and did not comport with the requirements contained in Civ.R. 5 because they did not contain a completed proof of service. Even if the objections were timely filed, they did not comport with the requirements contained in Civ.R. 53(D)(3)(b)(ii) that calls for an objection to be specific and identify with particularity all grounds for the objection. The court adopted the magistrate's decision and recommendation as its own, including conclusions of law contained therein. Judgment rendered in favor of defendant.

Judges: McGrath

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.