· 9/28/1998
Thomas v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction
Citations
- 36 F. Supp. 2d 997
- 1998 WL 996070
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “There is no ‘interception’ by a person or entity that never acquires the contents of any conversation.”
- “There is no ‘interception’ by a person or entity that never acquires the contents of any conversation.”
- “There is no ‘interception’ by a person or entity that never acquires the contents of any conversation.”
- “There is no ‘interception’ by a person or entity that never acquires the contents of any conversation.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Marbley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.