Thomas v. Logue
Citations
- 174 Ohio St. 3d 66
- 234 N.E.3d 380
- 2023 Ohio 3522
Syllabus
Workers' compensation—Subrogation—R.C. 4123.93(D)—Costs expended by Bureau of Workers' Compensation for a medical review that is used to deny a workers' compensation claimant's application for workers' compensation benefits are not recoverable in subrogation from an award workers' compensation claimant receives from a third-party tortfeasor for the same injury, because the costs expended for the medical review were not paid \on behalf of the claimant\ under R.C. 4123.93(D)—Court of appeals' judgment affirmed and cause remanded to Court of Claims.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the EPA's aerial observation of an industrial complex using sophisticated surveillance equipment did not violate the Fourth Amendment
- holding that photographing an industrial complex with a precision aerial-mapping camera not prohibited by the Fourth Amendment
- holding that photographing an industrial complex with a precision aerial-mapping camera not prohibited by the Fourth Amendment
- holding that the EPA’s aerial observation of an industrial complex using sophisticated surveillance equipment did not violate the Fourth Amendment
- holding that aerial view of an industrial plant did not violate the Fourth Amendment, even if “human vision is enhanced somewhat”
- holding that technology that allowed for an aerial view of an industrial plant did not violate the Fourth Amendment, even if “human vision is enhanced somewhat”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brunner, J.
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.