Skip to main content
· 6/7/2006

Thomas v. Lewis Engineering, Inc.

Citations

  • 848 N.E.2d 758
  • 2006 Ind. App. LEXIS 1069
  • 2006 WL 1543380

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the actual knowledge prong requires contact between the professional and the third party, not mere foreseeablity that a third party may rely on the professional opinion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Najam, Sharpnack, Robb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.