Skip to main content
· 11/21/2003

Thomas v. Johnson Controls, Inc.

Citations

  • 801 N.E.2d 90
  • 344 Ill. App. 3d 1026
  • 279 Ill. Dec. 798
  • 2003 Ill. App. LEXIS 1371

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • closing argument that is unsupported by facts in evidence is improper
  • the purpose of discovery rules, governing the “timely disclosure of expert witnesses, their opinions, and bases for those opinions is to avoid surprise and to discourage strategic gamesmanship”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Frossard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.