Thomas v. Hurst Home Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• allowing excessive force claim to go forward but granting summary judgment on MCRA claim where plaintiff failed to produce evidence of threats, intimidation or coercion
• allowing excessive force claim to go forward but granting summary judgment on MCRA claim where plaintiff failed to produce evidence of threats, intimidation or coercion
• “Plaintiff[] [is] not required to present medical evidence for a jury to find that their alleged distress was caused by the Defendants’ conduct.”
• denying summary judgment as to a malicious prosecution claim
• characterizing this as the “majority” view

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).