Skip to main content
· 4/5/1961

Thomas v. Howard

Citations

  • 168 A.2d 908
  • 1961 D.C. App. LEXIS 208

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “It was for the trier of fact to determine whether the publication was designedly excessive and whether the words were motivated by ill-will.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hood, Quinn, Cayton, Code

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.