Thomas v. Hartford Casualty Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that the burden of production remains with claimants through the RFC-determination
• ALJ’s determination not supported by substantial evidence where ALJ “did not mention any GAF scores at all- and provided no rationale for rejection of this evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).