Thomas v. Gee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the right to pursue an education is not a fundamental right protected against arbitrary action by substantive due process
• recognizing that property interest based on contractual relationship may arise “... when a student enrolls in a college or university, pays his or her tuition and fees, and attends such school ....”
• “The fundamental rights protected by substantive due process arise from the Constitution itself and have been defined as those rights which are ‘implicit in the concept of ordered liberty’ ”.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).