Thomas v. Gandhi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting as evidence of discrimination a third party statement alleging the existence of rumors of age-based animus
• rejecting as evidence of discrimination a third party statement alleging the existence of rumors of age-based animus
• stating that the court must not look at the use 5 Defendant points out that Mr. Bennett arguably “conceded in his deposition that he had no basis to believe that Ms. Deutermann harbored any discriminatory animus toward him.” (Def.’s Reply [52] at 8; Bennett Deposition 92-93.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).