Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Appellate Court of Illinois· 1/16/2004

Thomas v. Fuerst

Citations

  • 803 N.E.2d 619
  • 345 Ill. App. 3d 929
  • 281 Ill. Dec. 215

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \Whether conduct is extreme and outrageous is evaluated on an objective standard based on all of the facts and circumstances.\
  • “Whether conduct is extreme and outrageous is evaluated on an objective standard based on all of the facts and circumstances.”
  • “Whether conduct is extreme and outrageous is evaluated on an objective standard based on all of the facts and circumstances.”
  • If a “plaintiff fails to state an independent cause of action underlying his conspiracy allegations, the claim for conspiracy also fails.”
  • “To establish either slander or libel, plain- tiff must show that: (1) defendant made a false statement concerning plaintiff . . . . ”
  • “Conspiracy is not an independent tort.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Brien, Campbell, Reid

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Thomas v. Fuerst

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.