Thomas v. Folwell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• treating a person as an \insured\ in relation to one kind of claim but not in relation to another kind of claim
• “The rule for the interpretation of a statute is that... all its words [must be] construed according to the common and approved usage of the language”
• where defendant insurer failed to defend and insured defaulted in underlying claim, insurer barred in subsequent action from offering evidence showing that there was no gross negligence, because “[t]hat question was foreclosed by the judgment” in underlying action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).