Thomas v. Florida Power & Light Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court properly considered parents' prior care of other children in making adjudication of neglect
• concluding that the respondent had abandoned factual assignments of error when she \failed to specifically argue in her brief that they were unsupported by evidence\
• concluding that the respondent had abandoned factual assignments of error when she \failed to specifically argue in her brief that they were unsupported by evidence\
• holding that the respondent abandoned her assignments of error to findings of fact when she \failed to specifically argue in her brief that they were unsupported by evidence\
• holding that respondent's factual assignments of error were abandoned and the trial court's findings of fact were binding on appeal because respondent failed to \specifically argue in her brief that they were unsupported by the evidence\
• holding that respondent’s factual assignments of error were abandoned and the trial court’s findings of fact were binding on appeal because respondent failed to “specifically argue in her brief that they were unsupported by the evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).