Thomas v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a grooming policy regulating hair length and facial hair, which was applied evenhandedly to employees of all races, did not violate Title VII or 42 U.S.C. § 1981
• holding that a grooming policy regulating hair length and facial hair, which was applied evenhandedly to employees of all races, did not violate Title VII or 42 U.S.C. § 1981

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).