Thomas v. Fey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an affidavit was “not part of the record on appeal and may not be considered,” reasoning in 5 part that county did not “come forward” with the affidavit until “three weeks after notice of appeal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re the Estate of Kotowski
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2005-10-11· cited 6×
• Marriage of Kiffer v. Kiffer
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-08-18· cited 4×
• In Re Custody of ASR
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1995-11-07· cited 2×
• Ruppert v. Schmidt
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1995-11-07· cited 1×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1976-11-05· cited 87×
• Peterson v. Peterson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1976-05-07· cited 41×
• Nafstad v. Merchant
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1975-04-11· cited 17×
• Berg v. Berg
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1976-07-02· cited 14×
• Rieman v. Joubert
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-11-15· cited 13×
• Thomas v. Fey
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-11-05· cited 8×
• Marriage of Koponen v. Koponen
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-08-14· cited 4×
• Outcault Advertising Co. v. Farmers & Merchants State Bank
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1922-04-07· cited 4×
• Beaudet v. Beaudet
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1978-02-17· cited 1×
• McCarthy v. McCarthy
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-02-24· cited 1×