Thomas v. Eastman Kodak Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[P]laintiff does not contend that Kodak’s ... PAR layoff processf ] [was itself] discriminatory.”
• \[P]laintiff does not contend that Kodak's . . . PAR layoff process[] [was itself] discriminatory.\
• \[P]laintiff does not contend that Kodak's . . . PAR layoff process[] [was itself] discriminatory.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).