Skip to main content
· 7/21/2006

Thomas v. County of Camden

Citations

  • 902 A.2d 327
  • 386 N.J. Super. 582

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing grant of summary judgment to communications center employee under public accommodation theory
  • “[T]he lack of an employment relationship between the plaintiff and the defendant will preclude liability.”
  • \[T]he lack of an employment relationship between the plaintiff and the defendant will preclude liability.\
  • “Significantly, the prohibition of discrimination in relation to public accommodation is functionally distinct from the ban on employment discrimination.” (cleaned up)
  • “[T]he [NJ]LAD was intended to prohibit discrimination in the context of an employer/employee relationship.” (quoting Pukowsky v. Caruso, 711 A.2d 398, 405 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1998))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges Cuff, Parrillo and Gilroy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.