Thomas v. Corwin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that plaintiff could not show the employer’s reasons for her termination were a pretext for age discrimination where the plaintiff’s only evidence was that she was replaced by someone younger
• assuming that employee’s complaints about discrimination constituted protected activity under the ADEA
• affirming summary judgment for defendants on gender discrimination claim based on plaintiff’s unsupported and conclusory allegations
• noting mere allegations, unsupported by specific facts or evidence beyond a nonmoving party’s own conclusions, are insufficient to withstand a motion for summary judgment
• affirming the lower court’s grant of a motion to amend brought on the final day allowed under the scheduling order, and denial of one brought a month later where plaintiff had not reasonably contemplated the proposed amendment in the initial motion for leave to amend
• mere allegations, unsupported by specific facts or evidence beyond a nonmoving party’s own conclusions, are insufficient to withstand a motion for summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).