Skip to main content
· 7/15/1961

Thomas v. Cochran

Citations

  • 133 So. 2d 324

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • acknowledging that, although the “significance of the title of the statute should not be exaggerated” and cannot 5 Relatedly, Section 28-3903(c)(2
  • title of provision \cannot limit the plain meaning of the text\
  • appellant waives claims not raised in their briefing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.