Thomas v. Central Railroad
Citations
- 194 Pa. 511
- 45 A. 344
- 1900 Pa. LEXIS 427
Syllabus
<p>Negligence — Proximate and remote cause.</p> <p>The test of proximate cause is whether the facts constitute a continuous succession of events so linked together that they become a natural whole, or whether the chain of events is so broken that they become independent, and the final result cannot be said to be the natural and probable consequence of the primary cause.</p> <p>Negligence — Railroads—■Flagman—Proximate cause — Improper signal— Parting of freight tram.</p> <p>In an action to recover damages for the death of a locomotive engineer, against a railroad company which owned the tracks upon which the deceased was running a train for another company by which he was employed, it appeared that, shortly before the deceased’s train came to the place of the accident, a flagman employed by the defendant company gave a signal to stop a long train of empty freight cars, and that by reason of this signal, the purpose of which was not explained, the engineer of Ihe coal train slopped, and the rear end of the train which had parted piled up upon the cars ahead, throwing them upon the adjacent track, and leading to a collision in which the deceased was killed. Held, that the question whether or not the signal was negligently given by the flagman, and whether or not it was the proximate cause of the accident, were questions for the jury.</p> <p>Neglige nee — Railroads.</p> <p>A railroad company cannot be charged with negligence in making up a long train of empty freight cars so that they parted and caused acollision, where there is no evidence that the train was not made up in the manner usual at that time, and the testimony of an engineer tends to show that the parting of long trains was one of the ordinary risks of the business against which ho was constantly required to guard.</p> <p>Tort — Release from liability.</p> <p>f A tort feasor is not released from liability by a settlement between the injured party and one not shown to be liable.</p> <p>Negligence — Pleading—
Judges: Brown, Dean, Fell, Green, McCollum, Mestrezat, Mitchell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Musolf v. Duluth Edison Electric Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1909-07-09· cited 46×
- Boggs v. Jewell Tea Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1920-02-23· cited 43×
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. AllenSupreme Court of Florida· 1914-03-27· cited 38×
- Edens v. FletcherSupreme Court of Kansas· 1908-12-12· cited 36×
- Kaufmann v. KaufmannSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1908-06-23· cited 25×
- Randall v. GerrickWashington Supreme Court· 1916-12-05· cited 11×
- Stephenson v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1902-04-21· cited 10×
- Bonar v. HopkinsW.D. Pennsylvania· 1969-04-17· cited 10×
- Pittsburgh Rys. Co. v. ChapmanThird Circuit· 1906-05-28· cited 8×
- McClure v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1913-07-16· cited 7×
- Quinlan v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1903-04-20· cited 6×
- Shaughnessy v. PittsburgSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1902-07-10· cited 6×
- Hoffman v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1909-03-08· cited 6×
- Griffith v. Phillips Sheet & Tin Plate Co.Ohio Court of Appeals· 1916-12-15· cited 4×
- King v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1914-03-30· cited 2×
- Smith v. Pejepscot Paper Co.D. Maine· 1931-01-27· cited 2×
- Chapman v. Pittsburg Rys. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania· 1905-09-27· cited 2×
- Griffith v. Phillips Sheet & Tin Plate Co.Jefferson County Court· 1916-12-15
- Heyndricks v. FaudelCuyahoga Circuit Court· 1908-10-19
- City of Cincinnati v. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern RailroadCourt of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County· 1911-06-30
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.