Skip to main content
· 12/3/1991

Thomas v. Cassidy v. Douglas J. Cassidy, Arthur T. Susman and P. Terrence Buehler

Citations

  • 950 F.2d 381
  • 21 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 337
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 28423
  • 1991 WL 253362

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that decisions on the merits and post- judgment decisions on Rule 11 sanctions are separately appealable; until the district court “wraps up” the post- judgment Rule 11 issue, “there is no final and appealable decision”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coffey, Easterbrook, Crabb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.