Thomas v. California

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the IDEA doesn’t authorize prevailing parties to recover fees for services rendered by experts.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Mason v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2007-06-13· cited 23×
• Brooks v. Firestone Polymers, LLC
  E.D. Texas· 2014-10-08· cited 20×
• Real Property Located at 4125 Blanton, Wichita Falls, Wichita County v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2007-07-12· cited 13×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Davis v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 2006-06-19· cited 4,179×