Thomas v. BOMBARDIER RECREATIONAL PRODUCTS, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is certainly correct that a person who did not read a warning label is precluded from challenging the adequacy of the warning or from claiming that the allegedly inadequate warning proximately caused her any damage.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).