Thomas v. BFC Marine/Bath Fuel Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Strict compliance with the time limits is a prerequisite to consideration of an appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Landmark Realty v. Leasure
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2004-07-02· cited 25×
• Farrell v. City of Auburn
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2010-08-31· cited 10×
• Eliot Shores, LLC v. Town of Eliot
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2010-12-02· cited 9×
• Manon Cote v. Roger Vallee
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2019-10-31· cited 6×
• Hammer v. Secretary of State
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2010-10-28· cited 5×
• Estate of Claudette Sheltra
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2020-08-13· cited 5×
• Eric Ring v. Daniel Leighton v. Clinton McGaw
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2019-01-22

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• MP ASSOCIATES v. Liberty
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2001-01-30· cited 54×
• Davric Maine Corp. v. Bangor Historic Track, Inc.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2000-05-26· cited 45×
• Boothbay Register, Inc. v. Murphy
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1980-06-18· cited 22×
• Jones v. York
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1982-04-23· cited 15×
• Town of South Berwick Planning Board v. Maineland, Inc.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1980-01-08· cited 13×
• Torrey v. Full Gospel Church of Searsport
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1978-11-17· cited 11×
• Melder v. Carreiro
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1988-05-31· cited 5×