· 12/9/2009
Thomas v. Astrue
Citations
- 674 F. Supp. 2d 507
- 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 114903
- 2009 WL 4667106
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reversing for legal error after de novo review of the record
- “if [the opposing] party makes only conclusory or general objections, or simply reiterates his original arguments, the Court reviews the [R&R] only for clear error . . . [because parties] are not to be afforded a second bite at the apple”
- reversing for legal error after de novo consideration
- reversing for legal error after de novo consideration
- reversing for legal error after de novo consideration
- reversing for legal error after de novo consideration
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Richard J. Holwell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.