Skip to main content
· 12/9/2009

Thomas v. Astrue

Citations

  • 674 F. Supp. 2d 507
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 114903
  • 2009 WL 4667106

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing for legal error after de novo review of the record
  • “if [the opposing] party makes only conclusory or general objections, or simply reiterates his original arguments, the Court reviews the [R&R] only for clear error . . . [because parties] are not to be afforded a second bite at the apple”
  • reversing for legal error after de novo consideration
  • reversing for legal error after de novo consideration
  • reversing for legal error after de novo consideration
  • reversing for legal error after de novo consideration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richard J. Holwell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.