Thomas v. Arkansas Board of Correction & Community Punishment

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• plaintiff’s testimony that an optical illusion concealed a hazardous condition created a question of fact as to whether she could have detected the condition
• genuine issue of material fact where plaintiff testified she did not detect a change in elevation on a sidewalk because lighting was inadequate
• genuine issue of material fact regarding whether plaintiff should have seen hazard where plaintiff did not know about an “unexpected change in [ramp’s] elevation” and the lighting was inadequate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).