Skip to main content
· 12/8/1995

Thomas v. Alloy Fasteners, Inc.

Citations

  • 664 So. 2d 59
  • 1995 WL 723038

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Uniform Trade Secrets Act specifically provides for injunctive relief against actual or threatened trade secrets that may not yet have been disclosed
  • holding that confidential order edit lists are trade secrets because they reveal appellee’s pricing and profit structure
  • “Competition for business by a competitor ... is to be expected from former employees who are not bound by a non-compete contract.”
  • customer lists obtained from public sources, with nothing secretive regarding the class of likely customers, obtained by methods that are not “magical or secret,” are not protected as trade secrets

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.