Thomas-Smith v. MacKin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that purely subjective assertions are not actionable as defamation
• holding that purely subjective assertions are not actionable as defamation
• holding that purely subjective assertions are not actionable as defamation
• “The truth of the statement in the publication on which an action for libel is based is a defense to the action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).