Thomas R. Lussier v. Marvin Runyon, United States Postmaster General, Thomas R. Lussier v. Marvin Runyon, United States Postmaster General

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court’s acquisition of “extra-record information” was not subject to judicial notice under Fed. R. Evid. 201 because the information never reached the required level of popular familiarity
• holding that the district court’s acquisition of “extra-record information” was not subject to judicial notice under Fed. R. Evid. 201 because the information never reached the required level of popular familiarity
• concluding that the district court retained discretion to offset such benefits
• stating that a district court’s decision on a particular form of relief “must be assessed as part of the entire remedial fabric that the trial court has fashioned in a particular case”
• vacating front-pay award and noting that “[i]t is a fundamental principle of our jurisprudence that a factfinder may not consider extra-record evidence concerning disputed adjudicative facts”
• stating that \the hallmarks of equity have long been flexibility and particularity\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).