Thomas Pinner v. State of Indiana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding published orders on applications to file second or successive habeas motions are binding on all future appellate panels
• holding published orders on applications to file second or successive habeas motions are binding on all future appellate panels
• “[L]aw established in published three-judge orders issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b
• “[A] defendant must at least point to his own case or other cases in which the courts in fact did apply the statute in the manner for which he argues.” (alterations and quotations omitted)
• 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A) (2012)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).